NEP Principle-3

The NEP is seeking flexibility in learning and backs the learning where students are given freedom in how, what, when and where they learn. So basically, it means the ability to customize one’s pace, place, and mode of learning. With pace, for example, students may take accelerated programs or engage in part-time learning to ensure they have more time to work on subjects they are interested in. Learning can take place in a variety of settings, including in the classroom, at home or via the Internet. Mode refers to the way that lessons are delivered by technology, typically through blended learning or technology-enhanced experiences. Now, in today’s COVID-19 affected environment, does not this principle of NEP hold so much credibility and value?

The most fundamental structures in our schools are often inhibitors to progress: our schedules, our physical spaces, the class and group formations, and the composition of the teachers and staff everything is so restricted  in most of the traditional schools of our country. But flexible learning environments imply that the school adapts the use of resources such as staff, space, and time to best support personalization. It’s a combination of different structures, instructional strategies, and curricular approaches that allow a child to have access to what they need when they need it, to know what their next steps are in their learning, and to pursue areas of strength and interest.

To achieve personalization and flexibility in our schools we have to provide  flexible physical space in our schools, this means creating spaces for groups of different sizes in the school, small size escape rooms throughout the school so that smaller groups of students can work collaboratively for  activities like book readings and literature circles, math and science explorations, independent work etc. A teacher might also call a group of students into a smaller space to re-teach a concept or provide a lesson that extends the current concept for students who have already grasped it. So essentially in a flexible environment  schools don’t just have four walls, they have a bunch of walls that can open and close, so  space can be made to fit what is needed, rather than the space dictating what has to be done.

Besides the space, the flexibility, also extends to the use of time. Middle school teachers must have the ability to flex their schedules. Teachers can reorganize and schedule their timetables in numerous ways to allow for different uses of the time. For example, they might revise the schedule, shortening class periods, to create a block of time for project work etc. Students, with guidance from their teachers, identify what subjects they want support in, and sign up for specific classes to reinforce the learning during assigned block period. Sometimes this might be remediation of a concept taught earlier in the day. Other times it will be an extension activity for students who have already grasped the concept from earlier in the day.

In a flexible environment of learning student grouping is also very significant. Traditionally, students are grouped together for a specific class  and section at a specific time at the beginning of the year, and that class grouping doesn’t change , but now we know that all students are unique, and so this model has its limitations. So according to the new NEP teachers must work closely together to plan for instructions based on student need. If a group of students needs extra time on a certain math concept, they are given that extra time during a flexible block, regardless of which math class they are scheduled into. Teachers examine students’ formative work on a regular basis to identify what learning they need next. Students are then grouped and regrouped in response to that data. The research affirms that using data to frequently adapt and modify student grouping is a key aspect of personalization and flexible approach of learning.

These points bring us to the most crucial question, why has the NEP given so much importance to flexible learning? It is because across the world, it is found that that in a flexible environment, students are more likely to make connections between subject area and content skills than those not in a flexible learning environment. In a flexible learning environment, teachers more easily calibrate and adjust their language and methodology. Students build their ability to see the world as inter-connected, which we know it is. Additionally, using flexible grouping and time encourages students to further pursue their areas of strength and to get additional time and support in areas of challenge. Not only this, flexible learning environment increases teacher effectiveness because working closely with someone on a common goal enhances our lives. When teachers are working more collaboratively together, the benefits are substantial. Teachers learn from each other and get more regular feedback on their teaching practices. The teachers feel a sense of collective responsibility for all students’ learning.

So, all across India, from metropolitan cities to the remotest tribal region, teachers and other stake holders must be sensitized on the issue of flexibility in our school environment, if we wish to make NEP a success.

 

 

 

Previous
Previous

NEP Principle 4

Next
Next

NEP: Principle-2